2004 SAT Scores by Race and State

 

  • SAT Score for actual Whites is 162 points higher than reported by the College Board.

  • What they report as a 202 point gap between blacks and Whites is actually a 424 point gap between White men and black women.

  • States which are mostly Whites score 100 to 153 points higher than the “national average” for Whites.

  • Whites in Iowa score 236 SAT Math points higher than “whites” in New York.

 

Based on the racial composition of Iowa, the highest scoring  state with an SAT score of 1195, New York, one of the lowest scoring states at 1007, and Washington, DC, ground zero in intellectual achievement on EVERY test imaginable at 965, and the SAT scores reported by race, we should see scores of 1052, 1003, and 934 respectively.  This means that Iowa’s actual score was 134 points higher than its racial composition  would suggest it should be, New York’s was 4 points higher, and DC’s was 31  points higher.

 

 

 

  Iowa

Rhode Island

% Catholic

11%

45%

 

% Protestant

89%

55%

 

Whites SAT Math

613

533

 

Whites SAT Verbal

592

512

 
       

A = SAT Score Catholics

 

B = SAT score Protestants

 

Math

     

Iowa

0.11 * A + 0.89 * B = 613

RI

0.45 * A + 0.55 * B = 533

 

A = (613 – .89B)/.11

 

0.45 * (613 – .89B)/0.11 +.55B = 533

 

2,507.72 – 3.641B + .55B = 533

 

3.091B = 1,974.72

 
 

B = 638.9

 
 

A = (613 – .89 * 638.9)/.11 = 403.4

       

Verbal

     

Iowa

0.11 * A + 0.89 * B = 592

RI

0.45 * A + 0.55 * B = 512

 

A = (592 – .89B)/.11

 

0.45 * (592 – .89B)/0.11 +.55B = 512

 

2,421.8 – 3.641B + .55B = 512

 

3.091B = 1,909.8

 
 

B = 617.9

 
 

A = (592 – .89 * 617.9)/.11 = 382.8

       
 

Math

Verbal

Difference

Protestants

639

618

 

Catholics

403

383

 
 

236

235

471

 

 

 

In other words, if the SAT scores provided by the College Board for SAT scores by each race are correct, we would expect Iowa to score 1048 rather than 1195, we would expect New York to score 1003 rather than 1007, and we would expect DC to score 934 rather than 965.

 

 

Indian

Asian

black

Mexican

Puerto Rican

Hispanic

White

jew

Mamzer

Pre dicted

Actual

Diff

SAT Score

971

1084

857

909

909

926

1059

860

1002

     

Iowa

0.40%

1.60%

2.5%

   

3.80%

91%

0%

1%

     

N.Y.

0.50%

6.90%

17.4%

   

16.30%

57%

0%

1.50%

   

100%

D.C.

0.4%

3.2%

56.5%

0%

0%

8.20%

30.3%

0.%

1.40%

   

100%

Iowa

3.9

17.3

21.4

0.0

0.0

35.2

960.5

0.0

10.0

1048

1195

-147

N.Y.

4.9

74.8

149.1

0.0

0.0

150.9

607.9

0.0

15.0

1003

1007

-4

D.C.

3.9

34.7

484.2

0.0

0.0

75.9

320.9

0.0

14.0

934

965

-31

 

 

If all else is equal except the score of Whites, then the SAT  score for Whites in Iowa must be 1221 [162 points higher than the national average for Whites], the SAT score for Whites in N.Y. must be 1067 [8 points higher], and  the SAT scores for Whites in DC must be 1163 [104 points higher than the national average].

And the SAT score for actual Whites in the nation must be 1221 rather than the 1059 reported by the College Board, which means they misrepresent White intellectual talent by 162 points, and that the gap between Whites and blacks is 364 points rather than 202 points.

How can it be, though, that the White Race in Iowa scores 154 points higher than the White Race in New York, 58 points higher than the White Race in DC, and 162 points higher than the score for Whites reported  by the College Board?  How can this be rationalized or explained?

Because Whites are a majority in Iowa, their scores must be higher than Iowa’s average of 1195. Because blacks are now only 56% of the population of DC and Whites are  38.4%, it’s not completely unexpected that the average score for DC of 965 is 108  points higher than the average score for blacks of 857.  It’s revealing, though, that blacks in the “state” which spends more per capita for “education” than any other part of the globe [five times as much per student as Iowa], and have the absolutely highest per capita incomes for blacks  anywhere in the world, and have more police protection and more different forms  of police and have the world’s toughest gun control and drug war laws than most  dictators, would score LOWER than Mozambique.  But this is what  international tests like IAEP have shown.

The answer is jews.

Because jews demanded in the 1960’s that they not be counted as a separate race, we don’t know the exact population of jews in either DC or New York. Because Whites are only 91% and Asians are only 1.6% of Iowa’s population, if Whites there score 1221, then Iowa’s calculated score is exactly 1195.  But in order to explain the very low score of DC where blacks are only 56.5% of the population, we must assume that at least 4.5% of the population there are jews who score closer to their brethren in Israel than to any local populations.

Viola.  That fits the equation perfectly, giving DC a calculated score of exactly 965, exactly as reported by the SAT.

If that’s not the case [if there are no jews who participate in SAT in DC], then the only way to explain why DC’s actual score is 18 points lower than predicted is that the score of blacks in DC is only 826, which is 31 points lower than the national average for blacks.  IAEP suggests that’s possible.

But what about this whopping 154 point difference between Whites in Iowa and “whites” [note lower case ‘w’] in New York?

One thought on “

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.