‘Birther’ Polls: Independents Unaffected, Republicans Remain Divided



John Bingham, architect of the 14th amendment, defined a natural born citizen, at the same time?

he made clear that former slaves deserved to be citizens so that their descendant­s like any other citizens’ descendant­s could also be natural born citizens. Bingham added the 14th amendment to bring former slaves into the fold of America, but he emphasized that the 14th did not change the definition of the natural born citizen.In 1866 the Civil Rights Act reemphasiz­ed this, and it was reenacted verbatim in 1872, it is still on the books. It says if a child is born with any other allegiance or citizenshi­p it is not a US citizen.In 1874, Minor v. Happersett held that no 14th amendment citizen is ever a natural born citizen (because the 14th was added 6 years prior).”Al­l from other lands, who by the terms of [congressi­onal] laws and a compliance with their provisions become naturalize­d, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignt­y, are natural born citizens. Gentleman can find no exception to this statement touching natural-bo­rn citizens except what is said in the Constituti­on relating to Indians.” (Cong. Globe, 37th, 2nd Sess., 1639 (1862))
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.