Japan: The World’s Savers Retire

<<< congratulations to the japs for being able to save. many others can’t thanks to kikes in international banking and their political servants>>>


Their propensity to save is exceeded only by their propensity to HIDE those savings, which is exceeded only by their ability to KEEP those savings.

As you will see from the following, there is no other reason other than kikes that we no longer even HAVE Personal Savings, AND that our economic condition is worse, MUCH worse, than the jewsmedia blather will ever fess up to:


Family Income and Expenditure Survey


Average family receipts in Japan are now FIVE TIMES greater than ours!


The OECD estimates that Japan’s GDP per capita has hovered around $30,000 per year over the last decade. With an average household size of 2.52 this is $75,600 per household, consistent with the following Excel spreadsheet from the Japanese government website.

Total family receipts in Japan in 2008 were $120,740, of which $64,907 were income, of which $5,467 or 8.4% were earned by women. Their total cost of government was $15,184 or 12.6% of receipts. The average Japanese family spent $179 or 0.1% for medicine, $229 or 0.2% for securities, and $1,860 or 1.5% for education. The total increase in assets per family was $64,799, with $49,941 in savings and $14,858 for surplus.

This is the AVERAGE Japanese family. Worker families in Japan fare better than that.

U.S. GDP PER CAPITA: $41,657, OR $8,488?

The OECD also estimates that GDP per capita for the United States is $41,657. However, this is not at all consistent with the 2000 Current Population Survey from the US Census Bureau which put median "total money income" for ALL American households in 2000 at only $32,264 , at $21,027 for all Black households, and $23,421 for Hispanic households. This is not just wages and salaries, this is ALL money income, which includes welfare and a whole host of social transfer payments from White MEN to all other "minority" groups. If our GDP per capita actually WAS $41,657, and if there are an average of 2.8 members per household, then our median household income OUGHT to have been $116,340, 3.6 TIMES higher than it actually was. By what sleight of hand have our great white leaders misled us and the world about the true state of our sad economic affairs?

Furthermore, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics estimated than 100.2 million full time American workers earned an average of $29,432 in 2000, with White men earning $34,320, which is 28% higher than the $26,728 earned by full time Black men workers and 70% higher than the $20,176 earned by full time Hispanic men workers. This is a total income of less than $3 trillion, which is a GDP per capita for 274 million Americans of only $10,610 per year, ONE FOURTH of the OECD estimate. 20,572,000 of those full time employees were government employees who should not be counted in GDP just as they were not until relatively recently, and just as they are not in countries like Japan. Removing them places our REAL GDP per capita at $8,488. With 2.7 people per household in the US, family (or "household") income is $22,917.

More than half of American Blacks and Hispanics are not in the labor force at all, so their actual contributions to wages and salaries for Black and Hispanic households were less than $13,364 and $10,088, respectively. Social transfer payments from White employees to Black households were ($21,027 – $13,365) $7,662 and to Hispanic households were($23,421 – $10,088) $13,333, a very strong financial disincentive for White employees to produce. What respectable White man wants to work 42 days each year JUST to earn enough to pay JUST the taxes which fund JUST the social transfer payments JUST to Blacks who HATE them? And another 12 days JUST for Hispanics?

Since 2000, major corporations, huge companies, entire industries, our key jobs, have flooded offshore in record numbers and today we’d be LUCKY if per capita incomes are as much as HALF of what they were then. The US Statistical Abstract reports the following comparison for GDP per capita for selected countries:

2000 2007
Norway 43,921 49,606
United States 39,277 43,267
Netherlands 33,503 36,783
Canada 32,562 36,243
Austria 32,618 36,065
Denmark 31,987 35,213
Sweden 29,364 34,457
Australia 30,022 34,154
Belgium 30,296 33,607
United Kingdom 28,604 33,191
Germany 29,738 32,228
Japan 28,600 31,696
France 28,357 30,724
Italy 27,458 28,434
Spain 24,696 28,079
Korea, South 17,489 23,399

A REAL, HONEST comparison is based on the credible US Census Bureau survey that reported that wages and salaries in the US in 2000 were $29,432 per worker. GDP per capita could not possibly have exceeded $10,610, AND our incomes have DECREASED since this survey was completed. It must also include countries like Qatar, Luxembourg, Kuwait, Brunei, Singapore, and Ireland with per capita incomes MUCH higher than ours:

2000 2007
Qatar $87,600
Luxembourg 79,400
Kuwait 55,900
Norway 53,300
Brunei 51,000
Singapore 49,900
Norway 43,921 49,606
Ireland 46,600
United States 39,277 43,267
Iceland 40,400
Switzerland 40,100
Austria 39,300
Netherlands 33,503 36,783
Canada 32,562 36,243
Austria 32,618 36,065
Denmark 31,987 35,213
Sweden 29,364 34,457
Australia 30,022 34,154
Belgium 30,296 33,607
United Kingdom 28,604 33,191
Germany 29,738 32,228
Japan 28,600 31,696
France 28,357 30,724
Italy 27,458 28,434
Spain 24,696 28,079
Korea, South 17,489 23,399
U.S.A ACTUAL incl. government 10,610 9,549
U.S.A ACTUAL excl government 8,488 9,549

Japanese Annual Average Family Receipts were $120,740 in 2008

Total Japanese Family Receipts $120,740
Income 64,907
Wages and Salaries 61,100
Female (8.4% of family income) 5,467
Social Security Benefits 2,242
Public Pension Benefits 1,935
Receipts other than income (like withdrawal of deposits) 47,136
Expenditures 54,050
Consumption expenditures 38,866
The difference is the cost of government, or taxes 15,184
Direct taxes 5,124
Earned income 1,911
Residence 2,328
Other 886
Food 8,606
Alcohol beverages 407
Eating out 2,006
Housing 3,001
Repairs 637
Electricity 1,080
Gas 725
Furniture 1,162
Clothes 1,742
Medical care 1,320
Medicine 179
Medical services 776
Transportation and communication 5,804
Purchase of vehicles 800
Maintenance of vehicles 2,296
Communication, includes 1gb/sec ethernet speed at $58 per month 1,661
Education 1,860
Culture and recreation 4,136
Other consumption exp. (pocket money, social expenses, tobacco, etc.) 8,669
Personal Savings 49,941
Insurance premiums 3,411
Securities 229
Repayment of housing loans 3,928
Installment purchases 818
Surplus (in addition to personal savings, increase in financial and insurance) 14,858

DOES U.S. RANK 5th, 32nd OR 38th?

Rank Countries Amount
# 1 Luxembourg: $37,499.20 per person
# 2 Switzerland: $36,987.60 per person
# 3 Japan: $35,474.10 per person
# 4 Norway: $35,053.30 per person
# 5 United States: $33,070.30 per person
# 6 Denmark: $30,191.50 per person
# 7 Iceland: $27,473.80 per person
# 8 Sweden: $25,105.50 per person
# 9 United Kingdom: $24,486.70 per person
# 10 Austria: $23,824.10 per person
# 11 Netherlands: $23,770.30 per person
# 12 Belgium: $23,639.50 per person
# 13 Finland: $23,549.70 per person
# 14 Germany: $23,534.80 per person
# 15 France: $22,751.30 per person
# 16 Ireland: $21,846.50 per person
# 17 Brunei: $20,823.10 per person
# 18 Canada: $20,789.50 per person
# 19 Singapore: $20,066.00 per person
# 20 Italy: $19,276.10 per person
# 21 Australia: $19,213.50 per person
# 22 United Arab Emirates: $19,198.30 per person
# 23 Israel: $17,046.40 per person
# 24 Kuwait: $15,992.20 per person
# 25 French Polynesia: $15,023.50 per person
# 26 Bahamas, The: $15,019.20 per person
# 27 New Caledonia: $14,793.00 per person
# 28 Spain: $14,575.70 per person
# 29 New Zealand: $12,639.40 per person
# 30 Cyprus: $12,013.60 per person
# 31 Greece:

The Exoneration of Paul, Part 2/Feedback Requested

Very, very well done, Pastor Eli!

100% agreed, of course.


John Knight

Ps—there are some additional writings from Willie Martin at the following url, just in case you don’t have some of them. From our numerous online discussions I’m positive he would be in 100% agreement with your excellent analysis. You have added some excellent insights which are right in track with his thinking about them:


From: Eli James [mailto:eli-james@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 5:47 AM
To: Eli James
Subject: The Exoneration of Paul, Part 2/Feedback Requested

Christian Israel: I am very proud to present Part 2 of the Exoneration Series.


This article explains how the translators of Paul have butchered his words and put words in his mouth, words that he never uttered but which the transdlators have changed, invented or redefined, so as make Paul look like a universalist, antinomian, dispensationalist, and a wimp. Paul was none of these things. Part 2 explains how all of these fallacies originated with Paul’s translators. I would hope that the Paul-bahsers can swallow their pride and actually read what I have to say.

Here’s a sample:

Romans, Chapter 9

1I say the truth in Christ, I lie not, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Ghost, 2That I have great heaviness and continual sorrow in my heart.

3For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh: 4Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises;[There is simply no doubt that Paul is saying that all of these Old Testament experiences pertain only to True Israel and to no one else. His sermon is only to, by, for and about True Israel and is addressed exclusively to these people. All of the enumerated characteristics are what separate True Israel from the rest of humanity. – Eli.]5Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen. 6Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: [This means that there are impostors in our midst, i.e., Jews. See II Peter 2:1-4. It does not mean that non-Israelites are acceptable as “spiritual Israel.” – Eli]7Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: [Here Paul is singling out the Jews, who, at John 8 claim to be the descendants of Abraham, but Jesus Christ refutes their claim, as they are the descendants of Esau, not of Jacob. Since Esau was also a grandson of Abraham, the Jews can claim that they have a pittance of Abraham’s blood in their veins. – Eli] but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. [Tellingly, the Jews DO NOT claim descent from Isaac. Only the Saxons (Isaac’s sons) can make that claim. – Eli.]8That is, They which are the children of the flesh {the Edomite Jews},these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed. 9For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and Sarah shall have a son. 10And not only this; but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by our father Isaac; 11(For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth😉 [Jacob was elected; Esau was rejected. If you don’t understand the Old Testament, you cannot possibly understand the New Testament. – Eli.]12It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger. 13As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.”[(Mal. 1:2-3.) Paul is quoting Yahweh’s displeasure with the descendants of Esau: Gen. 25:34; Jer. 49:10; Obadiah. Isn’t it plain that Paul rejects the descendants of Esau as having any part in the covenants, promises, etc.? – Eli.]14What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid. [Yet, many modern Judeos would criticize Yahweh for rejecting the Edomites!!!! They think they know better than God!!! – Eli]15For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.

This article also goes on to explain that Paul teaches that the Ishmaelites were also rejected. Nowhere does Paul teach that non-Israelites can be heirs of the Covenants or Promises. It is Paul’s false interpreters and the Jew-deceivers who have created this false doctrine.

Pastor Eli James


We are in the process of finalizing the changes to the website. For a while we had white letters on a black background, but some people complained that it was too hard to read. So, we are now trying black-on-light grey. I would like to hear from you as to which you like better.


Also, we now have the entire Torah/Pentateuch (first five books of Moses) on the website, as translated from the Hebrew by Stephen Howard Anderson (two-seedline translation), plus the book of Psalms. Anderson’s translation is a lesson in the actual meanings of the Hebrew words. We also have two sections devoted to the proper translations of Paul: The Paul Conference and The Saul-Paul Controversy. All those interested in how the language of the Bible has been subverted by the Paul-deifiers need to look at the material we have there.

Praise Yahweh!

Bonus Item: Willie Martin on Christian Anarchists

God’s Law

Willie Martin



We hear much about the "Law" today in the national and local media. They are constantly saying "it is the law." But you will notice that it is never God’s Law which is to be observed, it is mans law and it is quickly putting shackles on us, our children and our grandchildren. This is not to say that law is not important, for law is essential to an orderly way of life. But it is to bring safety and peace not hostility and slavery.

It has been the continued and uninterrupted operation of God’s Laws of Life that has made possible the existence of the human race. In fact, law is so essential to our very existence that life itself came into being as the result of the operation of God’s Law (Which has not been done away with, the cries of the Judeo-Christian clergy to the contrary). The operation of law is not confined to our physical existence alone. Our very health and prosperity with every act and need of man, individually, socially and governmentally, are all governed bylaw; and if we keep and observe these laws all their benefits will accrue to us while, if we violate them, there will follow inevitable retribution and suffering.

When men come to a full realization of these facts, they will willingly apply themselves to understanding God’s Laws so that in the knowledge of their operation and in obedience to them they may secure a blessing instead of a curse. Then the many and varied problems of administration which have so troubled and perplexed mankind will find a solution in their observance.

Chaos is the physical, spiritual or economic life of man is evidence that there has been a failure to observe and keep the orderly laws of peace. A perusal of both past and present conditions with mankind afflicted with crime, violence and war; while revolution, famine and disease have taken their toll of life. Such evil conditions can only exist where there has been a violation of the perfect laws of life, the keeping of which will bring results far from chaotic.

Creation is an orderly process, while chaos results form the failure of man to observe and keep God’s Law which is the law of life and the way of peace, health and happiness. Life at its best, with all the blessings of peace, results from keeping the positive commands of God and refraining from violating the negative injunctions.

The Laws of the Lord were made known to man from the very beginning of our peoples history. "Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws." (Genesis 26:5) So God’s "Commandments," "Statutes," and "laws" were known to Abraham hundreds of years before Moses. We know this from scripture and because man would have had no guide to prosperity and peace. All the evidence of history and every factor of life continually demonstrate that the keeping of perfect laws is the very essence of a happy and enduring existence. And so it behooves us, if we would have perfection in living, to know them!

The Bible states, "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." A study of that creation reveals order and perfection with a minuteness of balance in accord with the so-called immutable laws of nature. The physical creation of the earth was followed by the creation of life; and finally, man. The same law operating in the physical is seen to operate in the instincts and habits so in evidence in the animal kingdom. Is it unreasonable to assume that "man," a higher order of creation, is also subject to law, and to laws higher than those governing the instincts and habits of animal life?

God took man, whom He had "formed," and placed him in the garden, "And the Lord God ‘Commanded’ the man." Thus the command of God became the law of life to man. From the very beginning man became subject to the commands of God and this was a law unto him, for God had placed man high above the rest of creation in that man was made responsible for his acts, having been given the right of choice and the power to choose.

It would be impossible to give a full and accurate account of the entire history of law as it applies to man, for to do so would necessitate the writing of the entire record of the human race involving the manifold phases of social activity, national affairs and international relationships. History, however, records the fact that the happiness, prosperity and contentment of a people is in a large measure the direct result of the type of law administered and the method of administration: a blessing for the people when the commands of God (which is the Divine Law) are kept and administered; and a curse when that law is violated and its administration ignored.

While the command of God became law to men yet, in the violation of that command, men became subject to the disasters and troubles which have afflicted the human race from the day of man’s disobedience until now. The antediluvian civilization which arose after man was driven from the garden was no exception. During the years following the expulsion of man from the paradise of God, there arose a civilization apart form God. Men were a law unto themselves and bound only by their goodwill to keep the commandments of God. The result was a complete failure to abide by the requirements of the law, which is clearly in evidence in the condemnation of that civilization: "And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually." (Genesis 6:5)

The deluge brought to an end this civilization of violence and crime. With the beginning of the new order human government was established, and to that government God issued the command: "Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man." (Genesis 9:6)

Here we have the first evidence of the introduction of human government for, though man may know the law of the Lord, that law will not enforce itself! Therefore, it became necessary to delegate to human society the right of administration and judgment. Men were now enjoined to organize society and government and to curb violence. Under this command every earthly government has a right, nay it is a duty and "command" to bring to justice the murderer and subject him to the death penalty.

Men have failed to recognize that from the very beginning of human history God’s Law has operated in the life of man. Because of this failure they have assumed that the law was first given to man at Mount Sinai. Nothing is further from the truth. God-fearing men have lived in accord with the principles of the law of the Lord centuries before the Mount Sinai experience of Israel and it is erroneous to attribute the knowledge of that law as coming to man through Moses. The revelation of God’s Law is from antiquity. Wherever we find men, there also for man’s guidance was a knowledge of the commandments, statutes and laws of God. True men ignored and forgot them but, nevertheless, God saw to it that in the beginning His laws were known to men.

The oldest record in Scripture, in which we have the account of the experiences of Job (who lived a few hundred years after the Deluge) makes mention of the laws of the Lord which were being kept by Job. Abraham was keeping these same laws four hundred and thirty years before the organization of the Israel Kingdom at Mount Sinai. This is borne out in the information given to Isaac to whom the Lord said He was performing His oath which He had sworn to Abraham, giving as one of the reasons: "Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws." (Genesis 26:5)

Thus Abraham observed the law long before Moses was born! Moses, however, had a task to perform and codified the laws of the Lord for Israel to administer at the time His people were organized into a Kingdom at Mount Sinai.

Inasmuch as Abraham kept the commandments, statutes and law, then of what law is Paul speaking when he refers to the promises made to Abraham four hundred and thirty years before the law? (Galatians 3:17) The passage is translated by Ferrar Fenton: "And I assert this — the rituals, beginning four hundred and thirty years after, could not cancel a Settlement previously established by God, so as to abolish the promise." The King James Version renders this verse as follows: "And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect."

It was not the commandments, statutes and laws of Almighty God which Abraham was keeping that Paul refers to as coming four hundred and thirty years after the promise but it was the ritual or religious service which was established or added at Mount Sinai because of sin (Galatians 3:19). Here Israel received their system of national worship, which had to do with the ordinances by which atonement was made for sin.

Establishment of this distinction between the law contained in commandments, statutes and judgments and the ordinances may not seem important. However, due to the erroneous teaching of multitudes of Judeo-Christian Church leaders regarding the law and their acceptance of the false doctrine that Christians do not have to keep the law, it is necessary to define this distinction between the ritual (abolished in Christ) and the laws of administration which are still in operation.

God’s Law is the very essence of life for, in the observance of the perfect Laws of God, life is worthwhile. The keeping of these laws is essential to orderly conduct and their administration is necessary in bringing justice and establishing equity and peace. Without law, anarchy would reign and society would be in a state of lawlessness and political disorder under which no government could function.

Judeo-Christians who advocate doing away with the law and who refuse to accept the operation of the principles of the commandments, statutes, and judgments of the Lord as the law of life in the conduct of man individually, socially, economically and in the administration of national affairs, are no different from the anarchist; for he also advocates the abolition of law. Judeo-Christians holding such doctrines believe that they are above the need of keeping the law. Anarchism at its best stands for society made orderly by good manners, but where there is no law there is no standard of conduct or good manners and the end of such a society is but confusion and disorder.

Anarchists are in rebellion against human government, but the Judeo-Christians who refuse to observe and keep the laws of God are in rebellion against Divine rule and government. It is a serious charge but, nevertheless, true. Peter declared that those who despise government are presumptuous and self-willed. (2 Peter 2:10) If God did establish a government and law upon the earth, it behooves every man, and certainly all true Christians, to conform with the requirements or come under the condemnation of being presumptuous.

What is the sin of presumption? Under the kingdom laws of administration, it is deliberately doing that which is known to be forbidden and are found in Numbers 15:29-31: "Ye shall have one law for him that sinneth through ignorance…But the soul that doeth ought presumptuously… the same reproacheth the LORD; and that soul shall be cut off from among his people. Because he hath despised the word of the LORD, and hath broken his commandment, that soul shall utterly be cut off; his iniquity shall be upon him."

Lest there be those who refuse to respect God’s Commands and Government in their daily living and life, by making the excuse that the New Testament doctrine has set them free from law observance, it is well to listen to the words of Christ in Matthew 5:19-20: "Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven."

Here we have an interesting promise made to Christians, for only those who are called by God, and accept Christ are eligible to position and power in the Kingdom. Greatness in the Kingdom will come to those who have kept, and taught others to keep, even the least of the laws. Condemnation and a place of obscurity is promised to those who are presumptuous and refuse to keep even the least of them.

Many passages in the Scriptures confirm all this, so let us not be anarchists and, above all, Christian anarchists, for the essence of an orderly and happy existence is to observe all the rules and regulations as contained in the commandments, statutes and judgments of Almighty God.

Once the fact is established that law observance is essential to orderly social relationships, it become necessary to make known to men the laws that must be kept. But along with a knowledge of that law is the need of an effective instrument or organization through which the law may be administered for the benefit of all men. God recognized this need and, though His laws were known for centuries before Abraham’s day, God called Abraham and in this call chose a family through whom He proposed to work, making the descendants of this man a servant nation to become the administrators of Kingdom laws. Through them He would demonstrate to all nations the righteousness and perfection of His government and Kingdom. Moses had this in mind when he instructed Israel to keep the statutes and judgments of God in Deuteronomy 4:6: "Keep therefore and do them; for this is your wisdom and your understanding in the sight of the nations, which shall hear all these statutes, and say, Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding people."

No matter how just and perfect a law may be, the mere knowledge of its existence does not bring it into operation, nor will that knowledge alone compel men to observe and obey its precepts. It is necessary that a nation adopt that law as the law of the land and through the acts of administration demonstrate the perfection of that law in operation. In the call of Abraham a race was chosen by God to whom was to be given the perfect laws and through whose administration He would demonstrate to the world the perfection of that law.

The Bible records the history of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel and the Egyptian sojourn of Jacob’s twelve sons. Then came the deliverance from Egyptian bondage under the leadership of Moses. Following the trek across the wilderness they arrived at the foot of Mount Sinai where they received a national charter from God and were enjoined to administer His commandments, statutes and judgments.

Following the Mount Sinai experience of this people there emerged from the wilderness a nation with a perfect system of administration and law, which left so deep an impression upon this nation that it materially influenced all its acts and deeds for thousands of years.

So don’t let anyone tell you God’s Laws have been done away with, for he/she is a liar, a deceiver, a false teacher and no prophet of God.


Judah and his marriage


Can we agree that, according to the WORD OF GOD, if Judah had sex with Tamar, Judah was MARRIED to Tamar UNLESS HER FATHER UTTERLY REFUSE????!!!!

Exodus 22:1-7 And if a man entice a maid that is not betrothed, and lie with her, he shall surely endow her to be his wife. If her father utterly refuse to give her unto him, he shall pay money according to the dowry of virgins.

John Knight

From: Russell Walker [mailto:littlefarm1@windstream.net]
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 4:07 PM
To: ‘Jacob Israel’; ‘William Finck’; ‘MichiMAC’
Cc: ‘Judith Nipps’; svaught09@windstream.net; eli-james@sbcglobal.net; skipbaker@cox.net; israelitesaxon@yahoo.com; 888@solarsabbath.org
Subject: RE: Judah and his marriage

John – the bible was only written to the house of Israel and not for race mixers like Judah and his Canaanite associates. Judah was never married to his first wife and he was never married to Tamar, the former wife of his son, either.

From: Jacob Israel [mailto:jk@israeliteidentity.com]
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 2:39 PM
To: littlefarm1@windstream.net; William Finck; MichiMAC
Cc: ‘Judith Nipps’; svaught09@windstream.net; eli-james@sbcglobal.net; skipbaker@cox.net; israelitesaxon@yahoo.com
Subject: Judah and his marriage

Can we all agree that under GOD’S LAW, this is ALL a "marriage" is?:

Exodus 22:1-7 And if a man entice a maid that is not betrothed, and lie with her, he shall surely endow her to be his wife. If her father utterly refuse to give her unto him, he shall pay money according to the dowry of virgins.

Nothing else, right?

Can we all agree that this CANNOT change, no matter how much we IGNORE it, or RIDICULE it, or INSULT GOD with it?

John Knight

Humm! All White Basketball Team Sparks Controversy! What’s Next!

It’s sad to see how many of my fellow WHITE men have fallen for the jew scam that niggers are great sportsmen.

"While inflaming the negro minority against the Whites, we will
endeavor to instill in the Whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of
the negroes, we will aid the negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of
life, in the professions, and in the world of sports and entertainment.
With this prestige, the negro will be able to intermarry with the Whites and
begin a process that will deliver America to our cause."

-Israel Cohen, 1919, a founder of the American Communist Party

Take five minutes to complete the Poll on Exiling Blacks

What they don’t ever seem to understand is that this is an immensely successful SCAM pulled off by the COMMNIST PARTY!

After almost 58 years of WHITE men winning the Olympic Gold Medal for us in basketball, the nigger “dream team” came back with a BRONZE medal, having had their assess whipped heartily by two WHITE teams.

If THAT doesn’t open some eyes about this jew SCAM, what WILL?!


John Knight

From: Heather Van Doran [mailto:vandoran.heather@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:07 PM
To: wakeupwayup@aol.com; mccloediii @dslextreme.com
Cc: judyfuller007@aol.com; kolaltai@russiamail.com; randulf.johan.hansen@c2i.net; alan_b.stard.m.p@westnet.com.au; ez4u2cme@aol.com; jmach499@yahoo.com; r.walker@windstream.net; jk@israeliteidentity.com; jackstoneisright@gmail.com; jk@blackexile.com; onepocketplayer@gmail.com; salemst@aoi.com; smithjayr@verizon.net; mferran@nycap.rr.com; mrdinga@gmail.com; joelrachmiel@aol.com; postherguy@aol.com; whatnowgop@yahoo.com; sergeantfreedom@hotmail.com; virginiaf.raines@gmail.com; shadyslife@aol.com; patriot451@aol.com; cougarden@msn.com; jboyle10@aol.com; kolsibir@ml1.net; harleymanfl@cox.net; chasnemo@aol.com; elliajt@aol.com; dagoodguys@yahoo.com; rockysma1@msn.com; maximus475@cox.net; alexjamesnews2@gmail.com; hogpod22@aol.com; konola@bresnan.net; algae5636@aol.com; antgne@aol.com; sfrenegademanboy@aol.com; baywife@aol.com; lfeverest@yahoo.com; blackexilenow@gmail.com; beau@gcbussu.com; boldsaber@gmail.com; cherif@cherifo.com; cherifasirry@yahoo.com; edpals2@yahoo.com; freddiestaton@gmail.com; hannajaeckel@msn.com; murray1833@aol.com; nora22000@sbcglobal.net; phayes9402@comcast.net; predatorbc@aol.com; robjeff@cablespeed.com; sergeantfreedom@gmail.com; sirguy2003@ameritech.net; vanzorge@optonline.net; wallyny@optonline.net; wolfram1@aaahawk.com; vivaveridad@yahoo.ca; mike_barsky@hotmail.com; ea.richards@att.net; jacklancaster@sbcglobal.net; rgellar000@yahoo.com; captainjames.brown@yandex.ru; captainjames.brown@verizon.net; colony14@gmail.com; finedude01@aol.com; ncooper@indy.rr.com; num1mema@aol.com; wolfgang48482@aol.com; debunks@sbcglobal.net; paul_dunk@msn.com; carpbear@sbcglobal.net; jimmybug@rocketmail.com; bbrabant@sault.com; uwhunter@earthlink.net; evedemian@verizon.net
Subject: Re: Humm! All White Basketball Team Sparks Controversy! What’s Next!

Maybe they should create an all-black basketball league with Gilbert Arenas as commissioner.

From: mccloediii

There are people who visit the local zoo many times a year for the same reason I guess, right?

And "money"? It takes a fool like you to think that we have any money in circulation but then the government depends on fools like you to think a lot of things that intelligent people won’t.

How does it feel being a "Useful Idiot"?


<wakeupwayup> wrote:

Nah! Ain’t dat stoop-pid! Aint’ nobody gon see that shyt nor will there be many big name sponsors. This is all about the D-O-L-L-A-R, "Ren, Tin, Tin Dog." LOLOLOLOL!!!

Where is that mouse folding over with laughter someone sent us last week…you know, he was gold in color and cracking up with laughter. Well, send that laughing mouse again in response to Mac’s comment on the need for an All-White Basketball Team.

LET’S SEE: An All-White Team or a limited 12% Black NBA Team…that’s what you proposed, right Mac? Okay! Then, who is going to sponsor that whack-ass league. Goodbye, AT&T, Verizon, Nike, Adidas, Radio Shack, Gatorade, General Motors, Nissan, Honda, Chrysler and Prudential. They are looking for "revenue." Chitlin Foods, Hamhocks-R-Us etc.

This is ALL ABOUT M-O-N-E-Y, Mac. People pay big BUCKS to go see those inner city thugs, as you call them, play REAL B-Ball. Besides, it is also about entertainment and showmanship. Who’s going to slam dunk in the "All-White" League? Whatcha gonna do…feed your kids growth hormones drugs for the height…sneak them in from Russia (can’t do that)…no the league requirements is that they are American citizens with Caucasian lineage. SOMEONE, please send that laughing mouse to Mac.