By the late 1930’s the BIS had assumed an openly pro-Nazi bias

<<< The problem with finding "proof" is that there is no proof. No evidence. Just conspiratorial assertions, in line with the falsehood that jews wrote The Protocols when the archival evidence proves they were written by the tsar’s secret police in Paris.>>>

Never in human history has there ever been more circumstantial evidence that a kike was a kike than there was in the case of Hitler the kike:

The 1934 World Almanac notes the following pre-WWII populations of Christians and jews:

Christians 682,400,000

jews 15,315,000

In 1948, after WWII, the 1949 World Almanac notes the following populations:

Christians 592,406,542

jews 15,753,638

Perceived difference:

Christians -89,993,458

jews +438,648

Thus, according to the most credible jew and Christian sources in the world, there were 89,993,458 FEWER Christians after the war, and 438,648 MORE jews after the war, than there were before. But, at the historic growth rate of the Christian population of 1.5% per year, the 682,400,000 Christians in the world in 1933 would have been 853,158,362 by 1948. Instead, mostly due to WWII, the actual population was 592,406,542, 260,751,820 fewer Christians than there would have been without WWII. Even at a more conservative growth rate of Christians of 1% per year, there were 199,838,673 fewer Christians in 1948 than there would have been without WWII.

Real difference:

Christians -260,751,820

jews +438,648


Between 1950 and 2000, a period of 50 years, the world population more than doubled, from 2.56 billion to 6.09 billion, an annual growth rate of 1.75%. Most of that growth was in the less developed countries where the population grew from 1.7 to 4.9 billion. The population of India increased 3.5 fold (2%/year) and of China 2.5 fold (1.7%/year), adding another 1.4 billion people to the world.

So it’s not at all unreasonable to expect that the population of Christians between 1933 and 1948 would have increased 1.5% per year had it not been for WWII:

Year At 1.5%/year At 1%/year
1933 682,400,000 682,400,000
1934 692,636,000 689,224,000
1935 703,025,540 696,116,240
1936 713,570,923 703,077,402
1937 724,274,487 710,108,176
1938 735,138,604 717,209,258
1939 746,165,683 724,381,351
1940 757,358,169 731,625,164
1941 768,718,541 738,941,416
1942 780,249,319 746,330,830
1943 791,953,059 753,794,138
1944 803,832,355 761,332,080
1945 815,889,840 768,945,401
1946 828,128,188 776,634,855
1947 840,550,111 784,401,203
1948 853,158,362 792,245,215


The above figures are very conservative. Had the population of Christians between 1929 and 1948 continued to grow at the recent rate of growth of Arabs, or 6% annually, there would have been 1.5 million more Christians in 1948 than there actually were. Had it grown at the rate of Africa, or 4%, there would have been 845 million more. India’s rate of 1.9% would have resulted in 383 million more, the average world growth rate of 1.5% would have resulted in 313 million more, the US growth rate of 1.1% would have resulted in 248 million more, and even the current low growth rate of Western Europe would have resulted in 158 million more.

Needless to say, by 2010 the figures are even more dramatic!

Amateur historians like Leonardo place the figure for the number of dead from WWII at 54 million, but they estimate only 20 million dead in Russia, whereas Russian sources put the figure as high as 64 million when the Bolshevik Revolution is included. Encyclopedia Britannica casually estimates the loss of life to be between 35 to 60 million, but this puts the Russian loss of life at 18 million, 46 million lower than Russian sources which claim the figure is as high as 64 million.

Where is the monument to up to 260 million CHRISTIANS who died JUST due to WWII, not even including the First World War nor the Bolshevik Revolution? Why are US taxpayers, the vast majority of whom are descendants and relatives of these dead Christians, expected to pay for holocaust memorials for six million jews who weren’t even Americans, are an enemy foreign power, aided and abetted our enemy and according to the jews’ own statistics didn’t even die?

Brought to you by crypto jews Churchill and Amery!

The following is a very, very important story for all of us to grasp, because this is exactly what jews did to Russia in 1917 as “bolshevists” who hated the “proletariat” [read: Christians], and what they’re now doing to the US as “neo-conservatives” who hate “gentiles” [read: the White Race].

Note that “In the last days of the pre-Hitler regime there were twenty times as many Jewish government officials in Germany as had existed before the war. Israelites of international attachments were insinuating themselves into key positions in the German administrative machine.” Is EXACTLY what has happened to us here, now. But also don’t forget that Germans got the worst of both worlds, because Hitler too was a jew, and HUNDREDS of millions of Christians died in WWII because of this scumbag jew.

The GOOD news is that millions of Americans are finally waking up to the truth that the “holocaust of six million jews” was a well crafted hoax to distract our attention from this REAL holocaust, which itself is proof that the power behind Bolshevism and Nazism is exactly the same as the one behind “neo-conservatives”:

Only an easily beguiled whore like you could get away with ignoring THAT!

John Knight

From: virginiaf.raines []
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:38 AM
To: Jacob Israel;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
Subject: By the late 1930’s the BIS had assumed an openly pro-Nazi bias

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:45 AM, Jacob Israel <jk> wrote:

Dear Alex,

100% agreed with the following:

<<<. Hitler, who is the grandson of Baron Rothschild of Austria, of course protected them. Its all part of the deception. >>>

There’s no other way to explain his rise to power.

And there’s no other explanation for why he would have wasted valuable war materiel in the midst of losing WWII to move the jews OUT of cities he knew we would bomb to smithereens.

But the problem is: where is the proof?

On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 9:46 AM, alex james <alexjamesnews44> wrote:

Whats interesting is that the Jewish Banksters in the Roman Empire and everywhere else in Europe are never touched. Hitler, who is the grandson of Baron Rothschild of Austria, of course protected them. Its all part of the deception. Let people vent their anger at ordinary Jews while the rich ones at the top make away with the loot, just like they are doing again with the multi-trillion dollar bailouts.

The problem with finding "proof" is that there is no proof. No evidence. Just conspiratorial assertions, in line with the falsehood that jews wrote The Protocols when the archival evidence proves they were written by the tsar’s secret police in Paris.

Hitler BELIEVED that German cities would not be bombed to smithereens. His military leadership assured him of it, but Hitler was also enthralled by his long-held presumption that Germany was destined to win the war.

Hitler’s grandfather was not a jew — much less a Rothschild (or alternative claims, Warburg or Frankenberger).

As a matter of historical FACT, jews were removed entirely from the Third Reich banks.

Max Warburg had reached such a high degree of influence in Germany’s financial world that even Hitler could not do without him. As a friend of Hitler’s Director of the Central Bank, the shadowy and opportunistic Dr. Hjalmar Schacht, Max Warburg continued his activities as a banker. He did well until 1938, when Schacht was fired and could no longer protect Warburg.

By that time two of Max’s brothers, Paul and Felix, had long migrated to the United States and founded the highly successful and influential Kuhn Loeb and Co., in association with Felix’s in-laws, the Schiffs. His brother Fritz had been imprisoned by the Nazis, but ultimately he was released through high-level intervention, whereupon he promptly left for Sweden.

Max alone, an ardent German patriot, refused to leave Germany.

Was Hitler part Jewish?

There are many versions of this story, but most point the finger at Johann Georg Hiedler’s brother, Johann von Nepomuk Huetler. (The spelling of the last name was always changing – the baptismal registry spells it "Hitler.") Some rumors say that because Johann von Nepomuk had no sons to carry on the name of Hitler, he decided to change Alois’ name by claiming that his brother had told him that this was true. Since Alois had lived with Johann von Nepomuk for most of his childhood, it is believable that Alois seemed like his son. Other rumors actually claim that Johann von Nepomuk was Alois’ real father and that in this way he could give his son his last name.

To add to the answers below – I understand that Hitler made a point of destroying the building that would have held his father’s birth certificate so the proof one way of the other was destroyed. (History Channel Documentary)


a. In the case of any illegitimate child whose mother refuses to name the father one would expect the entry in the Register of Births to be unrevealing and simply state ‘Father: unknown’. In other words, it would have been uninformative in this respect.

b. It is true that the building(s) and the churchyard were destroyed in 1938 on Hitler’s orders. He was presumably was nervous about some possible ‘dark secret’. However, it’s anyone’s guess what it was. There has, for example, been speculation about a history of incest or insanity in his family. Perhaps, for that matter, the entry had been tampered with, for example, when his father changed his name in 1876 from from Schicklgruber to Hitler. The ‘standard’ story about a Jew named Frankenberger in Graz as the paternal grandfather has been discredited. However, it has allowed devotees of psychohistory a field day.

c. Presumably the records were open to public inspection between the time when Hitler first hit the headlines and the Anschluss in 1938. In other words, oponents had already had 14-15 years to look for spicy information. – Joncey).


No. The Hitler family was Roman Catholic.

Hitler’s grandfather was not Jewish. The standard version of the story focuses on Hitler’s paternal grandfather. Hitler’s father’s mother is said to have worked as a maid for a Jew and there were rumours that Hitler’s father was actually the employer’s biological child. No evidence for this has ever been found.

Although there is no evidence that Hitler had a Jewish grandfather, supposedly his grandmother refused to reveal the identity of her child’s father to her death. There was a suspicion that it was her Jewish employer, but there is no evidence of this, and Hitler certainly never spoke of it.

Hitler certainly hated Jews, as one can read in his book, ‘Mein Kampf’. Most Austrian children were raised with a fear, mistrust and hatred of Jews, going back to medieval times, supported by the Catholic Church, that Hitler was born into. Hitler was filled with hatred towards many groups and people, and was a very angry man, as is obvious if you listen to his speeches.


Often suggested, sometimes claimed, but no established historian buys into what is probably just an urban legend.

There have been rumours that Hitler was one-quarter Jewish and that his paternal grandmother, Maria Schicklgruber, had become pregnant while working as a servant in a the household of a Graz Jew called Franberger. During the 1920s, the implications of these rumours along with his known family history were politically explosive, especially for the proponent of a racist ideology. Opponents tried to prove that Hitler, the leader of the anti-Semitic Nazi Party, had Jewish or Czech ancestors. Although these rumours were never confirmed, for Hitler they were reason enough to conceal his origins.


Ian Kershaw, "Hitler …", Vol. 1, pp. 7-9 dismisses the story as nonsense. At the time when Hitler’s grandmother worked as a servant in Graz for a family supposedly called Frankenberger (the 1830s) Jews were completely banned from living in Graz (and the whole province of Steiermark – Styria).

What’s more, according to Kershaw, study of directories of Graz and the like for the 1830s and 1840s doesn’t reveal any family called Frankenberger in Graz at all.

In other words, it’s an urban legend.

The BIS is the world’s oldest international financial institution, having been set up in 1930 with the twin aim of (1) coping with reparations/loans from/to a very unstable post-World War one Germany; and (2) more importantly, to act as a forum for central bankers in the future.

As such, it was the epitome of supranationality – able to circumvent all those orthodox ideals that had, over the years, become synonymous with the concept of the ‘nation state’ – such as ‘love of country’, ‘patriotism’ etc., – the danger, of course, being that, in certain circumstances (such as a state of war), such circumvention of patriotism by any of its board members could lead to them being accused of treasonable offences.

In order to appreciate what followed, it is essential to offer a brief resumé of the political/economic situation at the turn of the century: the Industrial Revolution, having fostered the rapid growth of a capitalist economy, inevitably gave birth to an ideal/dogma exposing the socio-political discord inherent within that same system which was based on the concept of one comparatively small group of people garnering profit from the wealth created by the labor of a much larger group. Thus was Marxism born – leading to the Bolshevik revolution in 1917.

The USSR, now perceived by the industrial nations as representing the very antithesis of capitalism, was henceforth ‘the enemy’. The ‘cold war’ had begun, and its most blatant expression was the birth of fascism in the aftermath of the Bolshevik revolution – a birth both induced and nurtured by corporations such as I.G.Farben, SKF, Ford, ITT and Du Pont – corporations which were fast becoming multi-national in nature..Enter BIS. Set up in 1930,it consisted, initially, of a group of 6 central banks and a ‘financial institution of the USA’. Granted a constitution charter by Switzerland, it was henceforth based in that country. That America was by then a financial force to be reckoned with on the international scene is borne out by the fact that the first President appointed to the BIS was Gates W. McGarrah (ex-Chase National Bank & Federal Reserve Bank).

By the late 1930’s the BIS had assumed an openly pro-Nazi bias – much of it disclosed by Charles Higham in his book "Trading With the Enemy", and years later corroborated by a BBC Timewatch film "Banking With Hitler" (broadcast in late ’98).

Two examples of such bias (there were many more) were: (1) The BIS had arranged transfers into the account of the German’s Reichbank of $378 million of what was, in effect, gold looted from the coffers of the invaded countries of Austria, Czechoslovakia, Holland and Belgium; and (2) in the summer of 1942, plans for the projected American invasion of Algeria were leaked to the governor of the French National Bank, who immediately contacted his German colleague in the BIS, SS Gruppenfuehrer Baron Kurt von Schroder (of the Stein Bank of Cologne), and by transferring 9 billion gold francs to Algiers – via the BIS – the Germans and their French subsidiaries made a killing of some $175 million in this dollar-exchange scam.

Given the membership of the BIS at that time, this was hardly surprising. On the board were the following high-profile representatives of the Axis powers (there were 4 others): Walther Funk (Pres. of the Reichbank); Kurt von Schroder (above); Dr. Hermann Schmitz (Jt.Chm. of I.G.Farben); Emil Puhl (V/Pres. of the Reichbank); Yoneji Yamamoto; and Dr. V. Azzolini (Gov. Bank of Italy).

It should be added that, of the non-Axis members on the board, many – such as Montagu Norman (Gov. of the Bank of England) were Nazi sympathisers, and that the President of the BIS from 1939 to 1946 was Thomas McKittrick, an American corporate lawyer who had been both Director of Lee, Higginson & Co. (a company which had made substantial loans to the Third Reich) and Chairman of the British-American Chamber of Commerce in London. His continued presidency of the BIS after America’s entry into the war in December1941 was approved by Germany and Italy with this significant addendum to their note of authorisation: "McKittrick’s opinions are safely known to us".

With the above noted disclosures in mind, the policy of appeasement pursued by Britain and France towards Germany in the pre-war period can now be more readily understood. By concluding a pact with Hitler, Britain and France – in effect – gave him the green light to advance eastwards (ref. "Mein Kampf"). Furthermore, the fact that they shared his endemic anti-communism blinded them to the risk that they were running by negotiating from a position of comparative military weakness – of which Hitler was perfectly aware – and for which they paid a heavy price. It should also be added that the architect of this act of appeasement, Prime Minister Chamberlain, was a shareholder in ICI, which had ties with I.G.Farben.

In the late ’30’s, and more particularly during World War 2, given America’s great wealth – as opposed to Europe’s straitened circumstances – it was inevitable that the trade between the two would be of a one-way nature, from the former to the latter. And not surprisingly, in view of the close relationship between American and German corporations (as noted above), a substantial portion of supplies went to Germany – often via fascist Spain – by ship and tanker under flags of neutrality.

Many of the financial arrangements covering such trade were handled by BIS in neutral Basle. As an example of how substantial this trade was: in mid-’44, America was supplying Germany with 48 thousand tons of oil, and 11 hundred tons of much-needed wolfram (tungsten) per month! The fact that this trade was illegal in the USA for much of this period – and particularly after America’s entry into the war in December ’41 – did little to stop such trade. The large corporations, such as Standard Oil and ITT, saw to that. After all, then – as now – the US Administration was effectively under corporate control (as it has been since 1933, during FDR’s first term of office). Even the Secretary of Treasury, Henry Morgenthau, and his Assistant, Harry Dexter White, aware as they well were of the part played by BIS in this, could do little about it.

In July ’44, 730 delegates from 44 countries met at Bretton Woods to plan a framework for post-war international trade, payments and investments – a conference which subsequently resulted in the setting up in’47 of both the International Bank for Reconstruction & Development (IBRD, or World Bank) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The apparent inviolability of the BIS referred to above was perhaps best illustrated by the fact that Resolution 5, calling for the dissolution of BIS, was subsequently ignored and proven ineffective. The corporate establishment had seen to that – as indeed, it had seen to all such previous attempts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.